« Sam Shamoun debates Nadir Ahmed | Main | Shotgun Design Question »

Upper Class Whites Need to Decide

As you may have read, Kay Bailey Hutchison (R - Texas) slipped an ammendment into the latest omnibus spending bill to revoke all mandates that a border fence be built. I've ripped this from Gates of Vienna since I didn't get the email from the Center for Individual Freedom:
Forget the fence.. It’s gone… Last month -- when they thought you weren’t looking -- the U.S. Senate passed a $555 billion omnibus spending bill that contained a tiny amendment revoking the mandate that the fence be built as originally specified.

And guess who slyly slipped in the amendment to gut SFA: Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison of Texas -- a state that has been ravaged and savaged by illegal immigration.

Her amendment reads:
- - - - - - - - -
“Nothing in this paragraph shall require the secretary of homeland security to install fencing, physical barriers, roads, lighting, cameras and sensors in a particular location along an international border of the United States, if the secretary determines that the use or placement of such resources is not the most appropriate means to achieve and maintain operational control over the international border at such location.”

Those who had fought to stop illegal immigration were stunned and angry.

[…]

Congressman Duncan Hunter said: “If Congress is to reverse its border stance after just one year, what message does that send to illegal immigrants and drug smugglers who are watching to see how serious we are about protecting America’s borders .”

As the Center put it:

Congressman Hunter was the driving force behind the building of the border fence in San Diego.

That fence consists of two layers with a Border Patrol access road separating the layers.

Congressman Hunter says the fence has reduced the smuggling of drugs and illegal aliens into San Diego BY A PHENOMENAL 90 PERCENT!

“If you get over my fence,” he says, “we sign you up for the Olympics immediately.”

In fact, he wrote the Secure Fence Act, which originally required a double layer border fence, just like the one in San Diego. The Hutchison amendment killed that requirement too.

TWO-FACED POLITICIANS -- REPUBLICANS AS WELL AS DEMOCRATS -- HAD NO INTENTION OF BUILDING A FENCE WHEN THEY PASSED THE ACT.

They voted for it while winking at one another, certain the time would come when you and I wouldn’t notice or even care when they hauled the Secure Fence out to the Washington city dump.

The only reason San Diego is not completely overrun is because of its border fence. Before it was built in the 90s, hundreds of people used to line up south of the border at a time and run across in a big group so that the border patrol could only catch a few people. It became such an embarrassment that Clinton actually signed the San Diego border fence into law - Clinton, of all people. Still, Mexicans from southern San Diego (Chula Vista), will often drive to the rich, white/asian northern part of San Diego and rob people there. My mother-in-law was telling me stories she heard from her own personal network of how her friends left their wallets in their car and wallets were stolen and money spent down in Chula Vista before her friends knew what had happened. Apparently, those poor Mexican illegals they hire during the day to do jobs Americans won't do may also be scouting their neighborhoods for free goodies and other targets of opportunity, like your children and wives. Another of my in-laws neighbors caught her Mexican gardener stealing from her after consulting with the gardener's other clients to discover that some of their stuff had gone missing as well.

Upper class whites can expect this and much worse if Mexicanization increases, and they are behind it. They own the businesses that hire Mexicans to do jobs Americans "won't do" so that they don't have to pay payroll taxes and SSI. They're the ones that pull the strings of these politicians to keep the borders open, deluding themselves with the notion that Mexicans are just coming here to do honest work and live otherwise crime-free lives. In reality, Mexicans who come across the border see how unseriously we take our borders so they think they can get away with whatever else they want. They also start gangs, who recruit young members who turn schools into war zones to harass American children.

Upper class whites are at a crossroads, in my view. They can either use their money to try to reform the laws that make it so expensive to hire American workers, (which they have not even attempted to do yet), or they can expect to lead increasingly isolated, harried lives. They can either use their influence to close the borders, or they can expect running gun battles between the police or military and drug cartels in the streets of once-safe cities as the US becomes more like Mexico. They can use their influence to pressure Americans of Mexican descent to drop their loyalty to Mexico and Mexican culture, or they can expect a fragmented future for the United States.

Posted on Thursday, January 17, 2008 at 01:32PM by Registered CommenterPRCalDude | Comments4 Comments

Reader Comments (4)

Nice article!

“THE KENNEDY WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY”

‘My guy can beat Hillary!!” That covers the best excuse the supporters of 'the top tier' candidates can give us. They all want you to believe that and it’s their biggest talking point. That and insults, rumors, marginalization. Seldom a discussion of a candidate's record is allowed.

I’ll vote for Obama before I’ll vote for Rudy, McCain or Huckabee. Obama can beat her. Then ‘the Kennedy Wing of the Republican party’ can finally get what they wished for....someone who can beat Hillary as the only qualification for office.

Do you remember one of the first debates many months ago when Duncan Hunter referred to some of his fellow candidates as , “THE KENNEDY WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY”?

THAT is why Hunter is out of the media coverage and the debates. He told the truth. CAN’T have that! (Not to mention stopping any discussion of China, bad trade deals and immigration.)

McCain, Huckabee, Rudy....look who they’re giving us...LOOK who the media and globalist media pundits are pushing!

I think we should start calling it exactly what it is, don’t you? Hunter, as usual, called it first and called it right.

“THE KENNEDY WING OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY”

California's Arnold is certainly a perfect example.

YouTube - New Hampshire Debate: The Kennedy Wing of the Gop
Duncan Hunter Watch video - 1 min 11 sec -http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUz-AgMGLQA

Be sure to read what people say in the comment section when they're allowed to hear Duncan Hunter.

http://towncriernews.blogspot.com/2008/01/kennedy-wing-of-republican-party.html

January 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterTheTownCrier

This might interest you as well.

GodVoter.com Endorses Duncan Hunter
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1945598/posts

Duncan Hunter answer the “BIBLE” Question - RE: CNN/YouTube debate

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: December 5, 2007

San Diego, CA – Presidential candidate and U.S. Congressman Duncan Hunter (R-CA) took the opportunity today to respond to a question posed to candidates at the CNN-YouTube Republican Presidential debate that occurred last week that he did not have an opportunity to answer. Holding a Bible, Joseph Dearing from Dallas, Texas, asked the candidates, “Do you believe every word of this book? Specifically, this book that I am holding in my hand, do you believe this book?” Congressman Hunter has sent Mr. Dearing the following letter in answer to his question:

December 3, 2007

Dear Mr. Dearing:

At last week’s CNN-You Tube debate, you asked the question of all of us “Do you believe in every word of this book?” meaning the Bible. As you know, the moderator called on my fellow candidates Governor Romney, Mayor Giuliani and Governor Huckabee to answer, but I myself was not given an opportunity. Allow me to respond directly to your question now. Do I believe every word of the Bible? Yes, by faith.

I find the center of the Bible to be these words: “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believes in him should not perish but have everlasting life,” John 3:16. If you believe in this promise, which so obviously is not scientifically provable, then is there any other event in the Bible that God’s hand cannot accomplish?

On June 28, 1787, at the Constitution Convention when the delegates appeared to be hopelessly deadlocked, old Ben Franklin made a speech, the central sentence being the following: “The longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?”

Following this statement, Franklin made a request resulting in the delegates approving a motion by James Madison to open every session with a prayer. The U.S. Constitution was thus born and this document, which delivers to every American the freedoms we enjoy, was produced by men of great faith and who very strongly believed in the Bible. Our further freedoms have been defended by American soldiers, 619,000 of whom were killed in battle during the last century, and a vast majority I feel believed the Bible.

I am sending you a book which I hope you will find instructive and persuasive, “A Third Testament” by Malcolm Muggeridge, chronicling the lives of great intellectuals in history who became followers of Christ and who believed in the Bible.

When I am asked by those who pride themselves on the reliance on provable scientific facts regarding the validity of the scriptures, I answer with one such set of facts. There are an infinite number of atoms on the head of a pin, each of which are circled by electrons. Who placed those electrons there? I hope their attempt to answer this question helps them to understand my three-word answer to your original question. Do I believe every word of the Bible? Yes, by faith.

Thank you again Mr. Dearing for your question. Sincerely, Duncan Hunter

January 17, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterTheTownCrier

Senator Hutchinsons' Press release regarding the Fence:

http://hutchison.senate.gov/pr011108.html

If the Border Fence language required that the fence be built from point A to B, I can understand the Amendment. The Amendment does NOT sink the Fence, but allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to determine which areas need the fence first, IMHO.

Now, if the Secretary of HS chooses not to build ANYWHERE, this is a horse of a different color. If the Fence does not get built due to a Senatorial cop-out, I, as a registered Texas Republican, will do everything in my power to derail KBH's upcoming run for the governorship.

January 29, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterTXMarko

Chertoff has been saying all along that he has no desire to build that fence. KBH knew exactly what she was doing.

January 29, 2008 | Unregistered CommenterPRCalDude

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>