2 is not enough
The liberal chatter nowadays is that "we" (meaning, "not liberals, but those weird military people") need a war with Iran and we need to keep fighting in Afghanistan to liberate wymyn.
What happened to "Bush lied, people died?" It seems to me that liberals are fine with wars as long as they're their wars. When I was down in Mexico, this Asian liberal kid I was there with was asking about Obama getting us out of wars. I made remarks along the lines of those contained in the Buchanan article I just linked, and he kind of looked dour. The Democrats are traditionally the party of war. Bush was pretty much a Democrat, and what did he give us but wars with no goals or purposes in mind? Now that Obama has the reigns, I anticipate a third war so that we can just merge all three into "one big one," as some lib Facebook commenter quipped.


Reader Comments