« "Reformed" Blacks of America | Main | National Debt Twitter »

'Hate' Crimes and the military

Vanishing American has a post up about a new bill designed to keep 'hate' groups out of the military (read:conservative white people). People belonging to 'hate' groups are defined thusly:
(B) Individuals known to have attended meetings, rallies, conferences, or other activities sponsored by a hate group. © Individuals known to be involved in online activities with a hate group, including being engaged in online discussion groups or blog or other postings that support, encourage, or affirm the group's extremist or violent views and goals.

From my perspective, this is fine for me because none of my children will be going into the military to die for our Goldman-Sachs-run government that sends us to die in unjust wars with no defined goals other than trying to keep a bunch of Muslim savages from shooting one another. Allowing that would be akin to offering my children to Molech.

I offered the following comments on VA's post:
The left has been going after the military for quite some time because its a big voting block for the Repubs. All that's going to happen is that they'll fill the ranks up with a bunch of leftists who won't actually fight when push comes to shove. It takes moral courage to fight, and the political Left doesn't have it and is constantly undermining it. What is more likely, though, is that the military would then be used domestically, ie to rough up political enemies at home like white people. If there are no real enemies, no matter, they can be ginned up with false charges and fake hate crimes. America's enemies abroad will be sure to capitalize on this. The only wild card is the amount of Mexicans we have in the military. They will probably still join because, for many of them, the military is an easy way out of the barrio. This would lead to a browning of our military, which is currently overrepresented by whites in combat positions (why, again, are we still doing most of the dying?)

The obvious implication of the browning/blackening of our military is that, if the military were to be used against domestic 'enemies', there will be a distinctly racial component to this usage, to wit, Mexicans and blacks will be used to police conservative whites deemed to be enemies by the State. Roughly 2/3rds of the whites in this country are conservative, so you get the idea.

Of course, the downside of this, from the Left's perspective, is that it takes a lot of guys with IQ to keep aircraft and expensive electronics running, so that means having enough whites and asians. Asians always go to college and enter as officers, so that rules them out. Jews always enter as officers too. That leaves whitey as the ethnic group with sufficient IQ to get the repairs done. I'm not saying that there are no blacks and Mexicans that can do the job - of course there are. I'm just saying there aren't anywhere near as many, as the IQ distributions of the various competing ethnicities in this increasingly balkanized country suggest.

Posted on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 at 12:44PM by Registered CommenterPRCalDude | Comments3 Comments

Reader Comments (3)

Hate takes on the quality of Humpty Dumpty in "Alice in Wonderland" where words mean whatever you want them to mean. With fewer and fewer whites (the only group that can hate) being allowed in the military, will we have to have the UN come in and help?

July 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterSameNoKami

This is about emasculating the military. Pure and simple.

July 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterLawrence

With fewer and fewer whites (the only group that can hate) being allowed in the military, will we have to have the UN come in and help?

I doubt it. The US and Europe are the enforcement arm of the UN. We're the ones that always show up as World Police.

This is about emasculating the military. Pure and simple.

Yep.

July 7, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPRCalDude

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>