Fjordman does it again
Read his latest on how the West lost the Cold War (and thus the war on Islamofascism as well). The conlusion is this:
Following the Cold War, the West was stuck with a large fifth column in our media and academia of people who were disappointed after the sudden collapse of the alternative to capitalism. They are slaves emancipated against their will, desperately in search of a new master. Their hatred for the Established Order never subsided when Marxism suffered a blow to its credibility. On the contrary, on some levels it increased. Although their attacks on the Christian, capitalist West are less ideologically coherent than in the past, this does not make them any less passionate.
They have decided to pursue the course of a gradual transformation of society through the education system and through destroying the family structure. The radicals have renewed hope of a violent upheaval. With the mass importation of Muslims, who have displayed such a wonderful talent for violence, and with rising ethnic tensions within the West, maybe they can finally get the armed revolution they were longing for.
The Swedish Social Democrats were pro-Fascist and pro-Nazi during the 1930s and 40s, appeased the Communists during the Cold War and cooperate with repressive and violent Islamic organizations today. They have consistently supported or appeased some of the worst societies and ideologies in human history, which between themselves have killed more than 150 million people in a few generations. Yet they are the good guys, the poster boys of the political Left throughout the world.
Now they forge an alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood, another organization with close ideological ties to the Fascist and Nazi movements. At a time when native Swedes are raped, stabbed, killed and chased out of their homes by Muslim gangs, the Social Democrats agree to continue allowing Muslims to colonize the country in exchange for their votes. In the old days this would be called treason. Now it’s called tolerance. It’s remarkable how similar the two concepts have become. Two Fascist-inspired movements cooperate on exploiting and abusing the native population of a country, force them fund and applaud their own colonization and denounce them as bigots, racists and Fascists if they resist. The strategy is as brilliant as it is evil.
Why do they get away with this? How come Socialists can stab their own people in the back, ally themselves openly with some of the most violent and repressive movements on earth and still manage to portray themselves as beacons of goodness? I am tempted to agree with former Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky: The West didn’t win the Cold War, at least not as decisively as we should have done. The belief-system we were up against has been allowed to mutate and regain some of its former strength. We haven’t defeated Socialism until we stage a Nuremberg trial and demonstrate clearly that the suffering, repression and massacres caused by Socialist regimes from Vietnam via the Ukraine to the Baltic were a direct result of Socialist doctrines.


Reader Comments (9)
They are ever more fundamentally dogmatic and orthodox about their secular communism.
Hmm...
I think the West needs to stand up for capitalism more. Mark Steyn wrote in a column about the liberation of Iraq in 2005:
"I prefer to speak of "liberty" or, as Bush says, "freedom", or, as neither of us is quite bold enough to put it, capitalism - free market, property rights, law of contract, etc. That's why Hong Kong is freer than Liberia, if less "democratic"."
The point is we need to say that capitalism is a force for good in the world. Beacuse it is. Here's a post dealing with the birth of modern capitalism in Europe: http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/58. The fact is that capitalism is fundamentally inseperable from liberty. But how many people understand this? Not enough.
The books linked at the end of the article explain this in greater detail.
Aengus,
I agree, but in order for a society to be a society, it's got to have some sort of ethnic and ideological cohesiveness. In order for society to succeed, the excesses of capitalism must be restrained. For example, we have a third-world invasion because big business wants it. They get it because our system is mostly capitalist, which allowed them to accumulate lots of money and buy influence. I traditionally supported big business and thought that it was a force for good. I increasingly doubt it. It's heartbreaking that, in the name of capitalism, the U.S. has squandered all of its social capital, which is what makes a nation in the first place.
National Identity (Society as PRCal says) is defined by borders, language and culture.
Multi-culturalism in any form, including heterodox theology, is part of the cultural aspect of society.
I say again:
National Identity (Society as PRCal says) is defined by borders, language and culture.
Multi-culturalism in any form, including heterodox theology, becomes part of the downfall of the cultural aspect of society.
Larry,
Exactly. It's cathartic to know there are actually people left who agree with me. Seems none of the business owners understand that the only reason they're getting rich is that their culture facilitates it. Once the culture's gone, so is the money. They are subservient to the culture, not the other way around.
Tell it like it is, Brothers.
In observing what our culture is becoming, it's no surprise that most of our capitalist enterprises have turned into what I call "Kool-aid Capitalists"- to heck with ethics and morals, profit and monopoly is the only goal. Free enterprise, as laid out in the Word of God, is quite simply described on the brass plaque that has stood posted since (if I'm not mistaken)the late 1700s at the Naval Shipyard in Newport News, Va.:
"We Shall Build Good Ships-
At A Profit If We Can,
At A Cost If We Must,
But We Shall Build Good Ships."
Does that even remotely resemble the accepted "wisdom" among corporate (and, frankly, private) America today?? Our self-absorption, the natural result of forgetting God, has brought us an illegal foreign invasion: corporate America wants cheap labor for bigger profit; Americans can no longer supply much entry-level/blue collar personnel because we've raised a generation of dysfunctional narcissists. And as P.R. has pointed out, the "Kool-aiders" can't see the full picture or the future because they just refuse to look past their own lavish lives and bank accounts.
Another good treatise on this topic: "The Real Immigration Threat" by Selwyn Duke.
http://www.selwynduke.com/
Sorry- haven't learned how to link yet...
Eeeyow...correction: the Newport News Shipyard was built in the late 1800s. Sorry...
Hello Rome! Helloooo Babylon!
Maybe we should study history a bit as see what happened to these great societies?